A Second O.T. Katie thread

The cartoons of hugob00m. Reader comments strongly desired!

Moderator: hugob00m

Forum rules
Only b00m's art and relevant comments should be posted here.
Post Reply
web-ed
Site Admin
Posts: 3341
Joined: Sun Nov 08, 2009 5:30 pm
Location: Chicago, Illinois USA
Contact:

O.T. Katie In No Smoking

Post by web-ed »

This one was smokin' hot, b00m! Some of the things I noticed:
  • Without looking at Katie's previous adventures I'm not sure, but I think you used some different camera angles here.
  • A double-spanking, which means double the fun for us!
  • When it was time to cool off the girls, Clorene got the bucket dumped over her head ('cause she's a hothead), while Katie got hers dumped elsewhere ('cause she had a hot seat!)
  • The white pants - these look good, and are something spanking video producers should note. If a spanking is to take place over clothes, they need to be of light color - dark colors make it difficult to see the contours of the target area. Similarly in a comic strip, light colors let us better appreciate the spankee's backside.
  • Speaking of which, we get to see Katie's bottom glowing right through her white pants - yes! Wouldn't have worked with dark colors.
  • Clorene did not escape in the end, and justice was done!
-- Web-Ed
hugob00m
Posts: 7209
Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2010 9:57 pm

Re: O.T. Katie In No Smoking

Post by hugob00m »

web-ed wrote:[*]When it was time to cool off the girls, Clorene got the bucket dumped over her head ('cause she's a hothead), while Katie got hers dumped elsewhere ('cause she had a hot seat!)
Hey! That's a great interpretation of the two buckets of cold water! ...And one I hadn't thought of! I did it that way because I didn't want to have to draw Katie with wet hair... and I figured I could get away with having Kauf aim the water lower because he's short. As usual, all of your comments are appreciated!
hugob00m
Posts: 7209
Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2010 9:57 pm

O.T. Katie comments

Post by hugob00m »

I'm a little disappointed to have so few comments on my latest effort. To Phil and web-ed: I'm glad that the two of you had something to say! Thanks!

But did anyone else even look at it? What about Dan, who always complains when he doesn't get comments on his stuff?

Just wondering. Did anyone besides Phil and web-ed see this one? Did you like it? Dislike it? Have mixed feelings?
willjohn
Posts: 2133
Joined: Sat Feb 05, 2011 7:12 am

Re: A Second O.T. Katie thread

Post by willjohn »

If Fitz keeps letting Kauf share the spanking the old man might decide to let him keep the company. They should employ more young women to keep their hands in.
daneldorado

Re: A Second O.T. Katie thread

Post by daneldorado »

hugob00m wrote:


But did anyone else even look at it? What about Dan, who always complains when he doesn't get comments on his stuff?



Of COURSE I looked at it, Richard. Forgive me for not replying sooner. As web-ed can tell you, I don't always spot all the new stuff until a few days later.

I totally LOVED the panel showing Fitz and the old man spanking BOTH girls, at the same time... Katie and Clorene.

And I admire that you preserved your integrity in the way you drew that panel. What I mean is, you have always drawn Mr. Kauf as being a right-handed spanker. And in THIS panel, you confirm that arrangement, by showing him from the BACK. Back in the Arild days, you once drew a pic of Katie being spanked along with her sister... but in that pic, you had the spankers facing US (the readers), and you showed one of the spankers using his left hand to spank, so that the two girls could face each other while they screamed and complained. Here, you have solved the problem and kept Mr. Kauf as a right-handed spanker. Both he and Mr. Fitz are right-handed, it seems.

However, in the future I wish you would keep Katie (and Clorene, and whoever) out of long pants and in short skirts. Skirts are much easier to lift up when the designated spankee is over your lap... plus, the sight of the girls' legs gives us guys a treat. Yes, I know you put them in tight pants that hug their curves; but it isn't quite the same as bare legs, is it?

Cheers,
Dan
hugob00m
Posts: 7209
Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2010 9:57 pm

Re: A Second O.T. Katie thread

Post by hugob00m »

daneldorado wrote:And I admire that you preserved your integrity in the way you drew that panel. What I mean is, you have always drawn Mr. Kauf as being a right-handed spanker. And in THIS panel, you confirm that arrangement, by showing him from the BACK. Back in the Arild days, you once drew a pic of Katie being spanked along with her sister... but in that pic, you had the spankers facing US (the readers), and you showed one of the spankers using his left hand to spank, so that the two girls could face each other while they screamed and complained. Here, you have solved the problem and kept Mr. Kauf as a right-handed spanker. Both he and Mr. Fitz are right-handed, it seems.
You may be the only one who spotted the left-handed right-handed thing. Since I had established both Fitz and Kauf as being right-handed, I had to turn them the way I did in order to get both women fully into the frame without overlapping them too much. In an earlier strip, I did a similar arrangement with one right-handed spanker and one left-handed spanker and both of them facing the viewer. Perhaps sometime I can do a double spanking panel with Armstrong, who is a left-handed spanker, but at the time I couldn't work him into a story about Katie's workplace.
jimc
Posts: 371
Joined: Sun Nov 22, 2009 12:10 am

Re: A Second O.T. Katie thread

Post by jimc »

Sorry b00m, i was out of town myself and i just found the latest Katy adventure as always i love your colors, your speech balloons and your narrative. it is hard for me to notice the little nuances that the artists find i just like how you draw Katy otk and her coloring. Her movement is also something i see,but i think after a lifetime of comic books the rules of motion seem to be the same as some universal language among artists so i accept it without a second thought. i do note that most of the comments seem to come from other artists like dan, phil,dave and web-ed. (all of them can discern your changes in style, brushstrokes etc and i have to admit i have not been able to discern even 3-d for the most part because of a stigmatism in my right eye.) So i do want you to know i really do appreciate your charactors and storyline i just can't critique your art beccause it is perfect to me just the way it is. Thanks for all of your time and talent in sharing them with us and while i may notice some things i do not know how to express any of them in a way that would help you in any way to improve or change your story. have a great day.
Jim
hugob00m
Posts: 7209
Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2010 9:57 pm

board quota?

Post by hugob00m »

I just tried to post a picture and got a message that the board quota for attachments had been reached. Does that mean for the day, for that particular thread, or that all of the posts in all of the threads have reached some sort of limit and that nothing new can be posted unless something else is deleted? If some deletions are neccessary, I'll voluntarily delete some of the first cartoons I posted to make room for others.
web-ed
Site Admin
Posts: 3341
Joined: Sun Nov 08, 2009 5:30 pm
Location: Chicago, Illinois USA
Contact:

Board Quota, and Members

Post by web-ed »

I don't want to lose your earlier stuff, b00m, and in fact I don't want anyone to feel they have to delete their previous attachments to make room for new ones. I checked, and there was a default limit of 50 MB for the board. I suppose this is because MySQL data bases do not store binary data (like pictures) with any great efficiency. On the other hand, I have dedicated one entire data base to this board, so there should still be some room out there, especially given the 256 KB size limit for each individual post. I'll see if I can find out what our capacity limit is for the entire DB. Supposedly, there's also a 3 attachment per post limit, but I've broken that one myself so many times I don't see how it can be in effect. Anyway, I've removed the 50 MB limit, so it should be o.k. now (I hope!). Please feel free to attach as much as you want.

If for some reason we do run out of space in the DB, we can still work something out by using CSR's non-DB space (of which there is plenty). This would require links in place of attachments (much the same way Dan links to his cartoons which reside on Image Titan). The only drawback to this method is that you would have to send me your cartoons ahead of time so that I could upload them with an assigned URL, to which you would then link in the post. Or I could help you lay out your cartoons on a regular web page which could then be posted in one of the galleries.

On a different subject, I understand the frustration you and Dan have experienced (and perhaps Phil feels the same way) at the small number of comments. I've addressed this several times, but another way of looking at it is that we only have 55 members at the present time (and even some of these are bogus and should be deleted), and non-members can't post any more because of spam. So maybe a large part of our problem is that we have a small membership! If I can think of a way to launch a successful membership drive, I will.
-- Web-Ed
Dave Wolfe
Posts: 60
Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 11:37 pm

Re: A Second O.T. Katie thread

Post by Dave Wolfe »

Hiya, bOOm!

The thing I've always loved about your Katie cartoons is your attention to her colorful, sexy wardrobe-- the textures, patterns, fashion designs and glorious color that not only accentuate her darlin' personality but her schwing inducing physiognomy!!

Oh my and holey socks-- Love those white outfits particularly, and how you showed her (their) red bottoms shining through, and the pink skin when they were wet and translucent!

I think I had some other things to say about this latest cartoon, but somehow my attention has wandered and I'll have to remark more later!

Thanks!!
Dave Wolfe
Posts: 60
Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 11:37 pm

Re: A Second O.T. Katie thread

Post by Dave Wolfe »

Oh, yeah, I remember now... I have to give you the highest Hilarity and Horniness Factor rating for the wet smack sound effects and the resulting spray of droplets during their wet bottom spanking! Oh, and the pantyhose smacking, too!

Usually I write better than this, but I seem to be having some kind of circulation difficulty.. not enough... oxygen... reaching... my... PLOP!
hugob00m
Posts: 7209
Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2010 9:57 pm

Re: A Second O.T. Katie thread

Post by hugob00m »

Thanks for the nice compliments! I did the white outfits with one of your earlier comments in mind...I'm glad you liked them! And then... getting the ladies wet was mosly due to the inspiration of McLintock!
web-ed
Site Admin
Posts: 3341
Joined: Sun Nov 08, 2009 5:30 pm
Location: Chicago, Illinois USA
Contact:

O.T. Katie Spanking Animated Video

Post by web-ed »

I'm not sure whether b00m authorized this or not, but someone called "ThaGODFATHER" animated one of his Katie spanking panels and set it to "music" in the form of the old Bonanza TV show theme music. The video is on YouTube here.

How about that - Katie has broken into other media! Can a Sam Swatt feature film be far behind?
-- Web-Ed
hugob00m
Posts: 7209
Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2010 9:57 pm

Re: O.T. Katie Spanking Animated Video

Post by hugob00m »

web-ed wrote:I'm not sure whether b00m authorized this or not, but someone called "ThaGODFATHER" animated one of his Katie spanking panels and set it to "music" in the form of the old Bonanza TV show theme music.
Well, I didn't actually "authorize" anyone to do an O.T. Katie video, but I never bothered to copyright the character or any of my stories, and so, "ThaGODFATHER" isn't really doing anything wrong. The animation he used is one I made a while back. Later I did a slight "revision" of my earlier animation, that I think is better.
Katie getting spanked 1.gif
Katie getting spanked 1.gif (151.38 KiB) Viewed 6018 times
I decided to take out a few frames to make the motion a little clearer. In doing so, I lost that little mouth movement of the man, as well as Katie's attempt to get up, but the I think I improved the kicking of Katie's legs and the impact of the man's hand on her butt. Another change I made was to put a pleated skirt on Katie. So... does anyone else have an opinion about whether the original animation or the "improved" one is better?
User avatar
overbarrel49
Posts: 3149
Joined: Sat Feb 05, 2011 7:51 am

Re: A Second O.T. Katie thread

Post by overbarrel49 »

hi boom,

huh? what did you say? i was busy watching katie's giggling, bouncing bottom :D . i like this one better for just those reasons. i checked out the older one but this one kind of holds my attention.....................LOL. speaking of animations and speaking of collaborations...............here's one i found in my collection that appears to fall into both categories. katie is getting the spanking but look who's watching from the picture frame :D phil
Animatied O[1].T. Katie.gif
Animatied O[1].T. Katie.gif (167.86 KiB) Viewed 6014 times
web-ed
Site Admin
Posts: 3341
Joined: Sun Nov 08, 2009 5:30 pm
Location: Chicago, Illinois USA
Contact:

Re: O.T. Katie Animation

Post by web-ed »

Phil,

That one from your collection is fun! And I agree with your preference for the 2nd version of b00m's animation.

b00m,

Katie's outfit looks like it might have been the one from the St. Patrick's Day episode. I prefer the 2nd version, mainly because of the "butt impact" aspect, which quite honestly is the first thing that gets my attention!

Now for a brief lecture on copyright law: as it happens, because of the revisions Congress made to the law in 1976, you DO hold the copyright to the character of O.T. Katie and all the stories you've written about her even though you never made a formal claim! So if I decided, for example, that I wanted to publish a monthly O.T. Katie comic book, I would have to reach a deal with you to pay royalties before I could do so, even if I hired other people to write and draw it.

As a purely practical matter, however, it would be difficult for you to assert your rights in most cases. For instance, "ThaGODFATHER" could claim what is known as "fair use" of your animation (and I'm not suggesting there's anything wrong in what he did; as far as I'm concerned, the more widely-known Katie becomes, the better). And unless someone were making, say, a multi-million dollar movie version of Katie, there probably wouldn't be any recoverable damages even if you prevailed on the infringment issue.

What you DON'T have without applying for it is a trademark. In many cases, the trademark can be more powerful (and lucrative) than a copyright, but unfortunately because Katie, as much as we love her, doesn't have any value to the advertising industry (I'm guessing), it wouldn't be worth the time and money it would take for you to secure one.
-- Web-Ed
sunflower309
Posts: 181
Joined: Thu Oct 03, 2013 9:14 am

Re: A Second O.T. Katie thread

Post by sunflower309 »

hi b00m!

I loved all of these but especially the first one. there were more young, good looking muscular spankers in these and that made me happy. but I didn't even think of sean connery as a spanker and I think he could be 100 and still be sexy so your choice to make scottie look like him was a great one! I loved Katie's outfit also. good job. and I like when scottie was first spanking herm her bottom didn't change color because you had conveyed the fact that he not really putting any effort into it. and then when he got into it I liked the red her bottom turned and he seemed like he was having more fun also.

even though she's only a toon I feel sorry she has to take so many spankings. but I like that you included all the men in on the fun. if I just had to pick one of those to be spanked by it would be a hard choice. but I think scottie would win!

I do not think the story was too long. I enjoyed every bit of it. the makeup scene was great. if I was going to have someone put makeup on my bottom I would prefer scottie as opposed to a make up lady! glad you didn't try to do the accent. as I read it I put the accent in myself and actually I could hear sir seans voice! I liked your second version better than the first.

and again thank you for all your hard work. it is definitely appreciated by me!

sunflower :D
hugob00m
Posts: 7209
Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2010 9:57 pm

Re: A Second O.T. Katie thread

Post by hugob00m »

sunflower309 wrote:I loved all of these but especially the first one. there were more young, good looking muscular spankers in these and that made me happy. but I didn't even think of sean connery as a spanker and I think he could be 100 and still be sexy so your choice to make scottie look like him was a great one!
I'm glad you like the spankers in these cartoons better than some of the others. I'll keep that in mind, now that there is at least one female in the audience. (I don't usually care... and I suppose that a lot of the male audience members don't care either, what the spanker looks like)
sunflower309 wrote:I loved Katie's outfit also. good job.
Me too. I think it turned out better than the first time.
sunflower309 wrote:and I like when scottie was first spanking her, her bottom didn't change color because you had conveyed the fact that he not really putting any effort into it. and then when he got into it I liked the red her bottom turned and he seemed like he was having more fun also.
I figured he might try to go easy on Katie at first,since he didn't know her at all, And he was bummed out that Lila wasn't going to play the scene herself. He had been looking forward to really letting her have it!
sunflower309 wrote:even though she's only a toon I feel sorry she has to take so many spankings. but I like that you included all the men in on the fun. if I just had to pick one of those to be spanked by it would be a hard choice. but I think scottie would win!
I suppose you would identify more with Katie, just like I tend to identify with the men in the story.
sunflower309 wrote:I do not think the story was too long. I enjoyed every bit of it. the makeup scene was great. if I was going to have someone put makeup on my bottom I would prefer scottie as opposed to a make up lady! glad you didn't try to do the accent. as I read it I put the accent in myself and actually I could hear sir seans voice! I liked your second version better than the first.
I'm glad you didn't think the story was too long. I stretched ot out a bit, but tht was just to show that she spent the whole day doing re-takes of that one scene. Heh heh! I guess I even feel a little sorry for her... and I'm the one who put her into that situation! I think Scottie himself must've sent the makeup lady home, so that he could rub lotion and then makeup on Katie's backside. And that must be because he likes women with round hineys! The director and his assistant can't seem to leave her bottom alone either!

Thanks for your comments! Even though I mostly draw Katie for my own enjoyment, I try to pay attention to what the people in the audience want too.
Post Reply