I realize that some of you members may not agree with me, but....
Your cartoon of a blonde woman on her knees, trying to fix a plumbing problem, is filthy. It is pornography.
I have drawn many pictures of pretty girls getting spanked, and I always enjoy showing their glorious, double-round buttocks on display. But I have NEVER included their vulvas (vulvae?) or any other part of the lady's genitalia. Yeah, sure, there are a lot of sites that will show you pics of those intimate areas, but I never draw them and I don't collect them. For me, seeing any part of the genitalia is an instant turn-off. Can't we just see the buttocks? That, after all, is where the spanking "action" is.
Cheers,
Dan
Lady plumber
Forum rules
Only Dan's art and relevant comments should be posted here.
Only Dan's art and relevant comments should be posted here.
-
web-ed
- Site Admin
- Posts: 3379
- Joined: Sun Nov 08, 2009 5:30 pm
- Location: Chicago, Illinois USA
- Contact:
Re: Lady plumber
Just getting to this now. I supposed I should move this to the Weekly Updates topic and perhaps I will although I forget under what topic I've dealt with the "exposure" question in the past. [Later note: after remembering that if I moved these two posts to "Weekly Updates" they would appear in chronological order there, separating them and confusing everybody, I decide to just leave them right here.]
Dan is referring to a Julius Zimmerman/Doctor Cylon piece that I posted four years ago now. The fact is that Zimmerman was a problematical artist, and he drew a lot of stuff that's way over the line. This probably isn't the place for the thorough discussion of Zimmerman's work, but it places me in a quandary: I don't like the pornographic aspects of it, and yet I don't want to deprive CSR
readers of his bending-over women and their bare buttocks either. Then there are Doctor Cylon's embellishments - I hate to deprive everyone (Doc has a lot of fans) of those, either.
Sometimes I don't print the stuff. There are about 40 pieces by Zimmerman in the Doctor Cylon "Unusable" sub-folder, which contains art I don't want to print either for legal reasons or because, yes, it's simply too pornographic. The current Tinker Bell Series has had a few by Zimmerman that were definitely borderline and I did at least censor the thumbnails. I don't know - maybe I should have held them back. It's impossible to make every editorial call correctly but rest assured I do hold back a lot of Zim's stuff. I think it's unfortunate that Zimmerman had this particular focus, and it certainly presented Doctor Cylon with some problems although I don't remember now the details of our correspondence on the subject.
At some point, a critical assessment of Zimmerman's artistic output, considered as a whole, will certainly be merited but I can't say when that will be or even if we should place it here or on the main site.
Dan is referring to a Julius Zimmerman/Doctor Cylon piece that I posted four years ago now. The fact is that Zimmerman was a problematical artist, and he drew a lot of stuff that's way over the line. This probably isn't the place for the thorough discussion of Zimmerman's work, but it places me in a quandary: I don't like the pornographic aspects of it, and yet I don't want to deprive CSR
readers of his bending-over women and their bare buttocks either. Then there are Doctor Cylon's embellishments - I hate to deprive everyone (Doc has a lot of fans) of those, either.
Sometimes I don't print the stuff. There are about 40 pieces by Zimmerman in the Doctor Cylon "Unusable" sub-folder, which contains art I don't want to print either for legal reasons or because, yes, it's simply too pornographic. The current Tinker Bell Series has had a few by Zimmerman that were definitely borderline and I did at least censor the thumbnails. I don't know - maybe I should have held them back. It's impossible to make every editorial call correctly but rest assured I do hold back a lot of Zim's stuff. I think it's unfortunate that Zimmerman had this particular focus, and it certainly presented Doctor Cylon with some problems although I don't remember now the details of our correspondence on the subject.
At some point, a critical assessment of Zimmerman's artistic output, considered as a whole, will certainly be merited but I can't say when that will be or even if we should place it here or on the main site.
-- Web-Ed