Hi Willjohn,willjohn wrote:Nice legs, promise of things to come.
I'm glad you enjoyed the view of her legs


You are right.......and I think she knows thatwilljohn wrote:Flimsy knickers will not last for long.

Moderator: overbarrel49
Hi Willjohn,willjohn wrote:Nice legs, promise of things to come.
You are right.......and I think she knows thatwilljohn wrote:Flimsy knickers will not last for long.
Hi web-ed,web-ed wrote:Oh yeah, those sheer panties provide very little protection from a spanking - besides, they'll be coming down before too long!
Yeah, I think you are right. Dave Wolfe suggested to me that I might consider putting the words on a separate page in situations like this one where I am attempting to tell a detailed story. I'm not sure just how that might work and I was thinking about getting Dave to give me a more detailed explanation of how to do this. On the one hand, I want to get in all the necessary details but on the other hand I don't want to turn this into an illustrated story. Of course, most of my stories don't have so many words in them.web-ed wrote: As for the words: well, here is the great limitation of the comics medium, which we've discussed before and I think here in your gallery - extended dialogue, Shakespearean soliloquies, etc. just don't work very well. You can manage them in prose, in classical drama, and if you're careful, in modern drama, but not in comics because each panel offers only so much space before you're stomping all over the visual elements. I remember when Will Eisner did Hamelt's famous soliloquy from Act III in comics form for a demonstration, he had to stretch it out over many panels, varying the character's posture the whole while, in order to make it work at all.
For the remainder of this toon I may just include the plain pics anywhere I think they are necessary. After that, I'll just have to see how things go in future toons. Thanks, Philweb-ed wrote:We even saw an example a few weeks ago, with the remake of "I Met My Master" as "A Man for Amy" where the second artist left less space at the top of some of his panels than Joe Maneely did in the earlier version, forcing the letterer to trim some of Stan Lee's dialogue. (Link here for reference).
It's a tough nut here, Phil, so I'll just say "thanks" for including the plain version for everyone to study.
This "wordiness" is the bane of comic strip artists everywhere... but it can be overcome. The idea is for the artist to realize, right from the start, that he or she will perforce be restricted in the amount of verbiage so that the artwork is not overwhelmed. A few years ago, when b00m was publishing his OTKatie toons, many panels would contain so many words, they would crowd out the pictures. I think I did point that out to him once, and he did not take it well, so I never brought it up again. I probably shouldn't be carping about Phil's work now, but this time at least I am not the first one to bring it up.As for the words: well, here is the great limitation of the comics medium, which we've discussed before and I think here in your gallery - extended dialogue, Shakespearean soliloquies, etc. just don't work very well.
Hi Dan,daneldorado wrote:This "wordiness" is the bane of comic strip artists everywhere... but it can be overcome. The idea is for the artist to realize, right from the start, that he or she will perforce be restricted in the amount of verbiage so that the artwork is not overwhelmed. A few years ago, when b00m was publishing his OTKatie toons, many panels would contain so many words, they would crowd out the pictures. I think I did point that out to him once, and he did not take it well, so I never brought it up again. I probably shouldn't be carping about Phil's work now, but this time at least I am not the first one to bring it up.
I wanted to make sure this point is emphasized, Phil, which is why I've quoted it above. The inability of comics to sustain extended dialogue is, in my opinion, the great weakness of the medium. It may even be a fatal weakness in that I remain unconvinced comics can reach the artistic heights of other literary forms. The fact is there's plenty of "talk" in most good stories. Let's take a well-known example from perhaps the greatest play ever written, and see what happened when Will Eisner, creator of The Spirit and Blackhawk, as an experiment once attempted to render Hamlet's famous soliloquy (Act III, scene 1) into comics form:overbarrel49 wrote:The problem with restricting the dialog in my toons is that these are usually taken from my fantasies, many of which are quite detailed. Also, while I can do some things to limit the number of words, the thoughts and feelings of the players are just as important as the artwork. In this case, where the girls are discussing all this, the dialog is often the most arousing part, which makes it even more difficult to find places to make cuts. Perhaps what I need is a different format, rather than the comic book style that I normally use but I can't imagine what that would be.
Hi Phil,Sweetspot wrote:I just had to chime in and say that I appreciate the nice back and forth dialogue on this topic. My own thought would be that it's important for Phil to stay true to his fantasies. I would think that's the fun part! (In fact I know it's the fun part.) I really enjoyed the pictures of the three girls just lazing around and talking about spanking. That was very sexy.
Thanks for your comments about this. It just seemed a shame to cover up so much of Barb and I thought this way we could enjoy looking at herSweetspot wrote:I also thoroughly enjoyed both versions of the latest chapter. I think you made a good-call in offering the plain view minus the dialogue as it allowed for a very attractive shot of our spankee to be. Thanks for contributing in such a happy way to my life in spanking.
Phil (Sweetspot)
Hi web-ed,web-ed wrote:Two observations, Phil:
1. It certainly looks like you were keeping in mind last week's conversation regarding long speeches, for you managed to get the speech balloons here well below the characters in the main part of the composition. I think we're glad to have the wordless panel version also, but it's less necessary this time around since our view of spanker and spankee is unobstructed. And speaking of that view:
I'm glad to hear that you think this pic is hotweb-ed wrote:2. This situation is unbelievably hot! That moment when the spankee knows she has no choice but to surrender completely and go over the spanker's knee is probably what females most fantasize about. I think you did a very good job at rendering that "weak in the knees" feeling on Barb's face every woman experiences just before her spanking begins. And of course there's not a red-blooded male in this audience that wouldn't love to be in Phil's place just about now (I see you must feel the same way since you named this character after yourself (and Phil Sweetspot, of course))
!
It really wasn't my intention to use up an entire year on this toon but, as I've said before, sometimes these stories take on a life of their ownweb-ed wrote:And congratulations on the one-year anniversary of Good Marks!I was a little premature with this last week, but I checked again and this chronicle of collegiate corporal punishment began on Friday March 11, 2016. This one deserves to go into the book of spanking world records!
Hi Phil,Sweetspot wrote:Nice, very nice and both editions are very hot! This is just how I imagine, in a best case scenario, the moments before a discipline or consensual spanking should look and sound!
Phil S.
Hi Boom,hugob00m wrote:Wow! I really loved panel 59! (the one with and the one without dialog!) The one with dialog gives us the context of the picture within the overall context of the story, and lets us know what Barb's thoughts were at the time and after the fact. The one without dialog gives us a clear view of Barb's legs... and her cute round posterior! And those nearly-see-through panties! Heh heh! Even if she had left them on, she wouldn't have had much protection from a spanking! I'm reminded of something that was said on Danny Kaye's old T.V. show in the '60s. I don't remember the exact words, but it was to the effect of, "I'll wear something diaphanous to distract him." And the response: "No. He'll see right through it!"
I've been getting comments from viewers that they would like to see Barb spanked ever since she first appeared in her jeans early in the toon. While many of these people thought she really deserved to get a blistered bottom, I never did really think she did anything all that bad. I have a hunch that her shapely spank spot is the real reason everyone wanted to see her get a spankinghugob00m wrote:She's doing her best to show him how submissive she is, to lessen the severity of the inevitable spanking she knows she deserves to get. Will it work? Actually, I sort of hope so! She hasn't been as naughty as Xandra or Anne, and she doesn't need to be punished as harshly as they did. On the other hand... I definitely wanted to see her turned over her boyfriend's knee, just because the target area is too good to neglect!
I really liked the view of Barb in place, OTK, waiting for her spanking and I was hoping everyone else would toohugob00m wrote:Panel 61 shows her in position to be spanked! Yummy! Just what I've been wanting to see! And I notice that, at least for the moment, Phil has set the ruler aside. Oh yes! If I was in his place, I would definitely want to feel some hand-to-buttock contact!
Great new developments in your story! Lots of fun! (Well... except for the spankees! Heh heh!)
Hi web-ed,web-ed wrote:Oh wow, Phil - you've provided us with many fine OTK scenes over the years, but you've certainly never surpassed this combination of bottom-up OTK positioning with a superbly rounded and proportioned rear end!This is the scene we've been waiting for, oh, ever since Barb made her first appearance wearing jeans that struggled to contain her generously-proportioned posterior
. I'm not sure how many hours you had to work on Barb's figure here, but however many it was, it was worth it! If I were building an Overbarrel Gallery over on the main site (unnecessary since this one here is easier for you to deal with) I would be strongly tempted to use this panel as the - I'm not sure what the word is! - frontspiece perhaps, for it. (Every CSR Gallery index page has a photo or drawing on it to symbolize what it is before we get to the thumbnails).
We will indeed be watching as her spanking proceeds and I hope everyone will enjoy itweb-ed wrote:Now we get to watch as Barb must hold her beautiful behind high up in the air while Phil reddens it with a good dose of his palm. And of course the ruler is always there should he need it. This is spanking!
Hi Dan,daneldorado wrote:Frontispiece? Or maybe, a logo?
Right you are, Web-ed. This lovely work of art belongs on the front page of something.
Don't be concerned about the placement of Phil's right hand. He's just enjoying feeling around.........and demonstrating his dominance to miss Barbdaneldorado wrote:I agree with everything you said about this magnum opus. Oh, maybe the position of Phil's right hand, in the OTK panel. To each his own and all that, but I would like to see his hand about three inches higher. Otherwise, it could look as if he is launching a thigh spanking. "Lisa," the girl I spanked most often in my scene days, told me that a thigh spanking is about twenty times harder than a spanking on her butt, and she recommended that I spank her bottom rather than the top of her legs. Come to think of it, somewhere I have a DVD in which Claire Fonda describes the perfect target as "right on the jeans pocket." I think she's right.
Again, thanks for the nice commentsdaneldorado wrote:Phil O, you are the master when it comes to OTK placement. You've got Barb positioned perfectly over Phil's (not you... the other Phil) lap, her stance is ideally placed for a solid ass-warming. I don't care if Web-ed says your "Good Marks" story is over one year old now, hell, let's make it TWO years! This quality of spanking toons should not hide under a bushel.
Cheers,
Dan