Re: Weekly Updates
Posted: Fri Jan 23, 2015 10:52 am
hi web-ed,
i like the new, clearer, scans of the Roy Lance spanking. the story itself is good, where our spankee deserves the spanking she is getting . as you noted, it would have been better if her bottom had been better defined. also, it looks to me as if her legs are a bit too short for the rest of her body? in any case, it's a good story and a good spanking panel. i also enjoyed your comments on the history of this. it is interesting that they could get away with reprinting this and just changing the names. it makes me wonder if contracts with artists and laws concerning this kind of thing in general were just less clear in those days. of course, it could be that no one noticed or no one gave a shit after 15 years? i also enjoyed you analysis of our rather submissive spankee. interesting..............i guess no 2 potential spankees are alike . you mentioned that the entire comic was recolored. what i noticed is that the person who did the coloring was apparently not that good at staying within the lines..............or do you get some sort of bleed on the coloring during the process of printing these? i also liked the "Bridgette" spanking. it certainly has an interesting history . we don't know what's going on here but the spanker is obviously pretty irritated and because of that is doing a good job of spanking her as indicated by the color of her bottom cheeks, while our spankee looks very embarrassed to be face down, with her bottom bared, getting a spanking . i'm not sure why her top is pulled up to bare her breasts..............except for the edification of the male viewers . that would seem to serve no purpose for the spanking itself. i was wondering if you knew why Oxken removed the spankee's mother from the scene? personally, i think it might have been interesting to see her reaction to the spanking . more good updates this week . thanks for providing them for us. phil
i like the new, clearer, scans of the Roy Lance spanking. the story itself is good, where our spankee deserves the spanking she is getting . as you noted, it would have been better if her bottom had been better defined. also, it looks to me as if her legs are a bit too short for the rest of her body? in any case, it's a good story and a good spanking panel. i also enjoyed your comments on the history of this. it is interesting that they could get away with reprinting this and just changing the names. it makes me wonder if contracts with artists and laws concerning this kind of thing in general were just less clear in those days. of course, it could be that no one noticed or no one gave a shit after 15 years? i also enjoyed you analysis of our rather submissive spankee. interesting..............i guess no 2 potential spankees are alike . you mentioned that the entire comic was recolored. what i noticed is that the person who did the coloring was apparently not that good at staying within the lines..............or do you get some sort of bleed on the coloring during the process of printing these? i also liked the "Bridgette" spanking. it certainly has an interesting history . we don't know what's going on here but the spanker is obviously pretty irritated and because of that is doing a good job of spanking her as indicated by the color of her bottom cheeks, while our spankee looks very embarrassed to be face down, with her bottom bared, getting a spanking . i'm not sure why her top is pulled up to bare her breasts..............except for the edification of the male viewers . that would seem to serve no purpose for the spanking itself. i was wondering if you knew why Oxken removed the spankee's mother from the scene? personally, i think it might have been interesting to see her reaction to the spanking . more good updates this week . thanks for providing them for us. phil