i like the new, clearer, scans of the Roy Lance spanking. the story itself is good, where our spankee deserves the spanking she is getting







To answer your first question, Phil, copyright laws have always been a little murky, although they're clearer now than they were at the time (Congress rewrote the law back in 1978, I think it was). Lawsuits and threats of lawsuits went on all the time in the comics industry (I've told the story of one or two of them over the years, for instance when explaining who the Spider-Woman character was). But even then, there was really no doubt that both the Roy Lance character (he had a continuing strip in Jungle Comics when this story was first printed) and the story itself were under copyright, presumably by Fiction House. But remember that Fiction House was primarily a book publisher which wanted to cash in on the then-profitable comics industry, so they farmed out the actual production of their comic material to the Iger-Eisner studio. That means it's just possible that Iger-Eisner held the copyright to the stories and art but not the major characters(!) and this would explain why Iger, 15 years later, felt that as "Art Editor" for Ajax/Farrell (an unusual title, by the way, as "Art Director" would be more typical) he could legally use the story and art as long as the "Roy Lance" name didn't appear (the likeness was probably seen as less of a problem).overbarrel49 wrote:it is interesting that they could get away with reprinting this and just changing the names. it makes me wonder if contracts with artists and laws concerning this kind of thing in general were just less clear in those days. of course, it could be that no one noticed or no one gave a shit after 15 years? ............... you mentioned that the entire comic was recolored. what i noticed is that the person who did the coloring was apparently not that good at staying within the lines..............or do you get some sort of bleed on the coloring during the process of printing these?
Me too, Butch - in fact I suspect we all wouldbutch wrote:WANT to see more spankings from Fiction House
I liked the new clearer scan, and the history that went with it.web-ed wrote:Comics Update: Roy Lance Spanking. We discovered this story was reprinted 15 years later, which gives us a nice new scan plus quite a few questions that we take a stab at answering.
I've never heard of the character, Bridgette, until now... but she's certainly done something to get that bald-headed bearded guy riled up! That's a very red bottom she has there!web-ed wrote:A most unusual item involving three different artists: Bridgette gets Spanked.
Probably, Butch - you may remember the Phantom said the same thing about "Being a mother to you" when spanking Zagra. I think that year was 1937, a little later than this one.butch wrote: can`t understand why he said he going to be a mother to her? maybe because back in the days Mothers was the ones who gave spankings to their bad offsprings when neeeded
You're welcome Dan, and I think you'll like Romantic Spanking Month, featuring as it does M/F OTK spankings from romance comics.daneldorado wrote:Thanks again, and... Keep the Faith!
First, thanks for explaining your goals to everyone so they don't have to rely only on my surmises! I don't think Dave Wolfe would object to your modifications, although of course artists can be understandably upset if they feel their existing work was bastardized rather than a new one coming into being. I print your modifications and those of Pablo because I think they enhance or perhaps just emphasize the originals. And judging from Phil's response, CSR readers are generally favorably disposed:oxken wrote:I do tend to remove everything that isn't directly involving the action in hand. A big part of this is that it makes the job a lot easier - very often, completing the background to match the modified action is harder than the main modifications - at least for someone with my very limited drawing skills. But I think maybe I also believe in The Spanking, The Whole Spanking and Nothing But The Spanking. So I have a tendency to undo cropping (I mean cutting off the edges of the picture!) and removing background
Apologies to anyone who preferred the original to one of my modifications and enormous apologies to any artist whose brainchild I butchered.
overbarrel49 wrote: i am a very big fan of Wolfietoons and i'm assuming that Oxken is too since he chose Dave's drawing to modify![]()
. thanks to Dave Wolfe for making our fantasies come true and to Oxken for the modifications
.
hi Oxken,oxken wrote:I wish I could draw, but I can't. So I am driven back to photoshop modifications. I am always nervous about modifying modern drawings and I didn't recognise that Dave Wolfe had done the original Blondie cartoon. I hope he regards my effort as homage - I loved the original, but I do have a preference for girls bent well over and I saw a chance to adapt the original.
O.K. so this wasn't from the actual strip... but the drawing by Dave Wolfe and Oxken's modification of it are a whole lot of fun!web-ed wrote:Comics Update: Dagwood Spanks Blondie #3. Oxken gives us his variation on Dave Wolfe's original drawing.
Mmmm! I like that one too! Ha ha! "Oo how 'e spank!" Do you have any idea what the story was that led up to that spanking? The dialog that we do have would indicate that she falsely accused him of something... and that he was almost put to death for it. I'd like more of the story, if you know it.web-ed wrote:Comics Update 2: a new version of Captain Easy Spanking #4.
Yes, I know that your preference is for M/F, b00m, as is my own and that of most of the regulars around here. We'll be seeing a good amount of M/F until Super Spanking Summer rolls around and the level of F/F goes up because that's what most artists draw. And even then, I do have some M/F ones to share.hugob00m wrote:First of all, let me say I'm delighted that you featured two M/F spanking panels of old-time comic strip characters!
Mmmm! I like that one too! Ha ha! "Oo how 'e spank!" Do you have any idea what the story was that led up to that spanking? The dialog that we do have would indicate that she falsely accused him of something... and that he was almost put to death for it. I'd like more of the story, if you know it.web-ed wrote:Comics Update 2: a new version of Captain Easy Spanking #4.
I was happy that both spankings featured this week in the update were M/F! A mother's boyfriend... someone who will probably become her step-father... isn't exactly my favorite situation. On the one hand, the spanking was done in a very business-like fashion... cutting down on the possible creepiness factor... but... it also made it totally unromantic. The young manager, working for the girl's father and spanking the girl DOES have some nice romantic potential! It's been done a lot... but that's because it works! Hmmm! I wonder if I could rip off... pardonez moi... HOMAGE that idea for one of my stories?web-ed wrote:The Second Annual Romantic Spanking Month kicks off this week:
Comics Update: This one's here on the Forum because no actual spanking is pictured even though one does take place - it's in a text feature of Romantic Adventures #16!
Comics Update 2: a new version of Campus Romances #2 in which a college graduate learns one more lesson over an older man's knee!