First of all, I appreciate your warning:
web-ed wrote:ugly M/M junk.
Unlike Dan, I looked anyway.because you always include such interesting historical tidbits, even if the picture itself is crap.
web-ed wrote:Romance Spanking Update: Better is True Brides Experiences #16, which may have been the least of what we dubbed "The Seven Spankings" but at least had a decent M/F scene. We have some new scans from the story's first appearance.
As you said, not the best, but at least it's a man spanking a pretty woman with his hand. The kneeling position does look awkward, and I've never tried it myself, but that was how Howard Keel held Kathryn Grayson when he spanked her in
Kiss Me, Kate. Perhaps that was the artist's inspiration.
I also like the fact that this update led to a discussion of the use and non-use of the OTK position, and how some people (including censors, unfortunately) consider the close proximity of the spanker's crotch and the spankee's to be erotic. One of my first exposures to "domestic discipline" was in 1963, when
McLintock! was first released. It was marketed as slapstic comedy, but, even as a ten-year-old boy, I thought it was
EXTREMELY sexy to see Maureen O'Hara in wet pantaloons turned over the Duke's knee for her "punishment". At that age, I was just beginning to be capable of getting an erection, and that was the first scene from a movie that ever gave me one! I suspect that the only reason that the censors ever let
McLintock! be released without some serious editing was that John Wayne used the decidedly un-erotic fireplace shovel to paddle Ms O'Hara's scantily-clad posterior, instead of his hand.
Unfortunately, back in those days... the only spankings I ever participated in were the F/m or M/m kind... with myself as the recipient. Those were definitely
NOT the least bit fun or erotic!
sunflower309 wrote:I had never given any thought to the OTK being erotic. my spankings are disciplinary so there are never any erotic thoughts going through my mind while OTK. I guess, now that I think about it, this can be a very complicated position, even in a case like mine. I used to think that spanking was a very simple activity. since I have been getting spanked and have found CSR I find there is nothing simple or uncomplicated about it. but thanks to everyone here I am learning to understand the complexities of spankings. I now understand there is nothing wrong with me wanting to be spanked, and that it is actually good for me. it hurts, it's embarrassing, I like the anticipation before and the warm glow after. so thanks for not only entertaining me but educating me as well!
It's interesting to read the "other" point of view! For me, as a spanker, it's an enormous turn-on to have a pretty woman turned over across my lap with her big round bottom pointing up at me!

For one thing, there is the feel of her thighs resting on one of my legs and her upper torso resting on the other. If I'm pretending to "discipline" the lady... (but really doing it for foreplay) I will rest my hand on her buttcheek while I "lecture" her about whatever "naughty" thing she may have done.

And then, of course, there's the visual attraction of having a beautiful woman in that position!

I love the way female buttocks are shaped! If there's any embarrassment involved, it's mearely a side-effect of what I'm really after. When I lift a skirt or lower a pair of panties, it's so that I can enjoy the view!