Chicago Spanking Review |
A Comparison of the Humorama Big Six Spanking Cartoonists - Part 1 |
---> Articles Section |
By Web-Ed |
|
INTRODUCTION The past three years (2010 - 2012) have been busy ones here at CSR. Among other things, I've come into possession of so many of the old Humorama spanking cartoons that a clearer picture has emerged of how, when, where, why, and by whom these "spankers" (as the editor referred to them) were produced. In this article, I'll concentrate on the "who" - specifically, The Big Six. "The Big Six" was a term I coined when it became apparent that the best and most prolific spanking cartoonists were Bill Ward, Bill Wenzel, Dan DeCarlo, Kirk Stiles, Homer Provence, and George Morrice (Morrice was a late addition, and by the time I realized how important his contribution was I was already referring to "The Big Five" in print, so he became Number Six). I decided to approach this study by isolating various aspects of the spanking cartoon. The aspects I'm going to compare among the group are The Gag, The Women, The Spanker, Positions, Implements, Drawing Style, Eroticism, whether he did F/F, and the artist's Attitude Toward Spanking. This last was inspired by Phil (Overbarrel) in a post on the CSR Bulletin Board (see Clues That Tell Us An Artist Might Be Into Spanking). Phil observed that "it seems to me that men who are into spanking are generally less interested in breasts than the average male, concentrating more on the bottoms." We will call this The Overbarrel Theory. Hugob00m then suggested that "Perhaps an important clue would be the practicality of the position portrayed in the drawing". We will call this The Hugob00m Hypothesis, and return to both these points when discussing the individual artists. |
![]() One of DeCarlo's best spanking cartoons as the maid hopes she can meet her employer's "stern" requirements. The spanker has no qualms about using her naivete to convince her to accept a spanking. Good OTK positioning with the usual small caveat that the spankee's weight never seems to be pressing down on the spanker's lap, sexy spankee (in a maid's outfit, yet!) with cami-knickers showing, and nice round bottom. (Click to go to the detail page). |
4. DAN DECARLO (1919 - 2001) Gags: Our own Dan Rivera, himself a modern-day spanking cartoonist, has noted the wittiness of DeCarlo's gags. They were definitely a cut above the "spanking-good" or "spanking breeze" kind of wordplay often seen elsewhere. Early on, DeCarlo had some help with his gags from from his inker over at Timely/Marvel/Atlas, Rudy Lapick, and in later years he just imagined the spanking situation and let editor Abe Goodman write the captions because he felt he was doing too much work for too little money. In some cases he seems to have taken a situation pioneered by Bill Wenzel (for example the Secretary Spanking) and then refined it into his own unique style. The gag very often revolves around a lecherous spanker using a flimsy excuse to whack some pretty girl's bottom, figuratively (and sometimes literally) winking at the male reader as if to say, "Good fun, eh bud?" Women: DeCarlo had long experience drawing pretty girls in a "cartoony" stile with Betty and Veronica in Archie and with Millie the Model over at Timely/Atlas. They were sexy, but shorthand-sexy from the caricaturist's quick pen rather than Good Girl Art-sexy in the style of Bill Ward, Matt Baker, Maurice Whitman, and others, and this was the style he brought to his Humorama work. His spankees are always pretty and always have spankable bottoms clad in tight-fitting cami-knickers. Interestingly, they never enjoy being spanked, their attitudes ranging from naïve and puzzled ("But today isn't my birthday!") to dismayed but accepting. |
||
![]() DeCarlo worked at Archie and Timely at the same time he was doing cartoons for Humorama. Here we see his work on the April 1957 issue of Timely's Millie the Model. The style is pretty much the same as he used for the Archie gang. © Marvel Characters Inc. |
Spanker: DeCarlo's spankers are the most generally lecherous of any of the Big Six's, typically enjoying using any flimsy excuse to whack the shapely rear ends of attractive young women. Positions: DeCarlo employs the OTK position almost exclusively and does it very well, at least from the standpoint of displaying the spankee's pretty bottom. Hugob00m has pointed out that "some of Dan Decarlo's women look as if they're suspended and the men just happen to be under them." (See Dan's post Vintage Black & White for the observations of Dan, B00m, and Phil (Overbarrel)). It has been suggested that this is because DeCarlo drew the women first. Implements: DeCarlo never uses anything but the hand, making him something of a purist. Drawing Style: DeCarlo is basically a caricaturist who keeps the exaggeration to a minimum. His drawing style was made famous in the Archie line of comic books, where it was eventually adopted as the model for the Archie characters. A few of the characters in his spanking cartoons resemble members of the Archie gang such as Betty, Veronica, or Reggie. |
||
![]() At Timely, publisher Martin Goodman's approach was to jump on whatever bandwagon seemed to be selling at the time and then milk it dry. Millie the Model was a great success, so similar titles like Sherry the Showgirl quickly followed. Here we see DeCarlo's art on the December 1956 cover. © Marvel Characters Inc. |
Eroticism: Because his style uses the cartoonist's shorthand to denote a sexy girl, I feel the amount of eroticism is limited. Others may disagree about this, but I feel a certain amount of realism is necessary to produce an erotic effect, and a "compressed" drawing style, without many lines, cannot be too realistic, although of course it can be very good for storytelling or humor. Also, humor and eroticism are two different things - they can be mixed, but one usually predominates. Despite these considerations, it's undeniable that a certain amount of eroticism does enter the mix with DeCarlo, it's just that I maintain that mix is dominated by humor. F/F: DeCarlo is the only one of the group who never drew anything other than M/F spankings. This seems to me to be another display of DeCarlo's great virtue of consistency. Attitude Toward Spanking: Like Stiles, DeCarlo certainly has no problem with seeing his female characters spanked, and we may infer that he probably would have had no objection to a little spanking in real life. But there's certainly no sign that he was a true spanko, and I think his effectiveness in the spanking genre was due to his talent and professionalism. |
![]() Possibly Homer's finest spanking cartoon. Bottom raised nice and high, this spankee certainly has no problem with being spanked. The homely-looking spanker obviously cares a great deal about her. In placing the spanking within the context of a loving relationship, Homer was somewhat ahead of his time. (Click to go to the detail page). |
3. HOMER PROVENCE (1919? - 1975?) Gags: Homer seemed most comfortable with the office and domestic settings – in fact, his office scenes often have a domestic feel to them! He typically dresses an erotic or semi-erotic spanking up in disciplinary clothes, but pure, strict discipline isn't generally his style. His F/F scenes are a little more disciplinary. Women: Homer's straight lines sometimes give his women rather flattish bottoms, but also give their faces an elegant and intelligent look. He drew their lower legs a little too long, but this isn't always noticeable. Homer's women stand in stark contrast to Ward's bimbos: they actually look human, and are usually active and willing participants in their spankings. Spanker: Often older than the women and not particulary good-looking, Homer's men exude a kind of homely simplicity, and their obvious affection for the spankee can be touching in way none of the other group members can match. |
||
![]() Homer was quite comfortable setting both spanking and non-spanking cartoons in the office. From the July 1968 issue of Zip but had certainly been printed earlier. Click to double-size. |
Positions:Homer uses the OTK position exclusively. Implements: In one of his F/F scenes, Homer used the hairbrush but otherwise stuck with hand-spanking. Drawing Style: Homer was dependent on straight lines rather than curves, basically the exact opposite of Bill Wenzel in this as in other ways. He also seemed less comfortable with the ink wash than Wenzel, Stiles, or DeCarlo (Ward used the conte crayon instead), and in terms of pure drawing skill was probably the least accomplished of the group. And yet, he was better than many if not most of the other artists who contributed to Humorama, having at least a recognizable and unique style, and managing to imbue his characters with a humanity that sometimes escaped the others – women who are clearly onboard with spanking and derive pleasure from it, and spankers who sincerely care for them. Eroticism: Probably most of the eroticism in Homer's "spankers" derives from the willing submission of the women and their overall slender, feminine appearance. |
||
F/F: Homer did three F/F scenes, typically a somewhat more mature woman spanking a very young one in a disciplinary context. Attitude Toward Spanking: Homer apparently saw spanking mainly as a kind of sexual foreplay perfectly appropriate for a loving couple – even his office scenes never seem truly disciplinary. This puts him squarely ahead of his time (and the rest of the group) with a startingly modern perspective. One husband/wife scene, which oddly features his best-rounded female behind (Nagging Wife Spanking), and his F/F scenes do seem more purely disciplinary. |
![]() Spanking Day at the Greeting Card firm? No caption available, but we still like this Morrice cartoon because of the good OTK positioning and the pretty spankee with well-drawn cami-knickers and a worried expression. (Click to go to the detail page). |
3. GEORGE MORRICE (? - ?) Gags: Some of Morrice's gags seem to be variations on themes originated by the Six (marriage counsellor, cop spanks scofflaw) while others seem more distinctly British (maid spanks her miss, butler spanks mistress). A few of them, like the wife asking her husband to cane her before he looks at the car she smashed up, may be original. Perhaps these were the early efforts, and he later tried to be more like the Six, who between them sold so many cartoons to Abe Goodman. The execution is always at least adequate. All Morrice's spankings are disciplinary with, of course, humorous overtones. Women: They are generally young and pretty, but not exaggerated. The lower legs are often a little long, just like Homer's. Perhaps their best feature is the typical expression Morrice gives them - they know this is going to hurt, and they're worried about it! Like DeCarlo, Morrice used relatively few lines to convey expression, but his style was completely different. And like Stiles, Morrice sometimes seemed to have trouble drawing the cami-knickers properly, making them look something like a half-slip, but with no panties – yet we don't get a bare bottom either! Spanker: Runs the gamut from teacher, husband, butler, even the milkman gets a chance! They are typically disciplinary figures who don't seem to have any ulterior, lascivious motives in delivering the spanking as DeCarlo's usually do, but a few of them follow in the footsteps of the DeCarlo men and seem to be having a pretty good time. Positions: The OTK position is used almost exclusively (one time a wife bends over for her husband's cane). Implements: Only member of the group to ever employ a slipper or the cane, most of the time the hand is used. |
||
![]() A Morrice non-spanking cartoon, set in the doctor's office, in which a pretty girl is about to receive an injection. As with his "spankers," our delight comes from her discomfiture as she realizes just where she's going to get it. Boy, does she look worried! (Heh-heh!). Click to double-size. |
Drawing Style: Very hard to put into words. The critic should be able to come up with something more specific than "old-fashioned" or "British", and yet those are the words that come most readily to mind. His style is rather sparse, making do with relatively few lines, and has an emotional restraint that recalls the Victorian era, or at least what we in America think of when we visualize that era. And yet it does get the job done without excess fuss. Morrice was a decent artist, but without the flash and polish of a Bill Ward or the sheer technique of a Kirk Stiles. His cartoons are very good from the standpoint of humor, and invite comparison with DeCarlo for that and other reasons even though the two men's styles are completely dissimilar. Eroticism: The simple lines, loose-fitting and occasionally maladroit cami-knickers, and the restraint embodied by the British stiff upper lip sometimes limit the erotic potential of Morrice's cartoons. At other times a cute spankee, tight-fitting cami-knickers, and good OTK position enhance the eroticism. |
||
F/F: Only one example known, Maid Spanks Her Miss. My suspicion is that he tried this having seen Ward's many examples in an attempt to sell more cartoons to Abe Goodman. I don't know too much about the British market for cartoon humor, but it couldn't have been too great or Morrice wouldn't have expended so much effort at Humorama, where his rate could only have been $15 per cartoon at most. Attitude Toward Spanking: The Overbarrel Theory might suggest an interest in spanking since Morrice drew ordinary-sized bosoms, but because his positioning is not always practical the Hugob00m Hypothesis leads to the opposite conclusion, that he had little personal knowledge or interest in spanking. It's impossible to say with any certainty, but it does seem that the "spanker" made up a large portion of the cartoons Morrice submitted to Goodman. That could have been because he thought that's what Goodman would buy (and if so, he was certainly right!) or it could have been because he really enjoyed doing them. My impression is that the former explanation is correct, for Morrice was going to a lot of trouble to sell to Humorama, sending in his cartoons from overseas. |
![]() |
On to PART TWO |
![]() |
Back to ARTICLES page |
![]() |
Back to HOME page |